首页> 外文OA文献 >A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR TEACHING RECEPTIVE LABELING TO CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS
【2h】

A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR TEACHING RECEPTIVE LABELING TO CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

机译:患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童接受标签教学方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many early intervention curricular manuals recommend teaching auditory-visual conditional discriminations (i.e., receptive labeling) using the simple-conditional method in which component simple discriminations are taught in isolation and in the presence of a distracter stimulus before the learner is required to respond conditionally. Some have argued that this procedure might be susceptible to faulty stimulus control such as stimulus overselectivity (Green, 2001). Consequently, there has been a call for the use of alternative teaching procedures such as the conditional-only method, which involves conditional discrimination training from the onset of intervention. The purpose of the present study was to compare the simple-conditional and conditional-only methods for teaching receptive labeling to 3 young children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. The data indicated that the conditional-only method was a more reliable and efficient teaching procedure. In addition, several error patterns emerged during training using the simple-conditional method. The implications of the results with respect to current teaching practices in early intervention programs are discussed.
机译:许多早期的干预课程手册建议使用简单条件方法来教听觉-视觉条件歧视(即接受性标签),在这种方法中,在要求学习者有条件地做出反应之前,在有干扰力刺激的情况下单独教授简单的歧视。有人认为这种程序可能容易受到错误的刺激控制,例如刺激过度选择性(Green,2001)。因此,人们呼吁使用替代教学程序,例如仅条件教学法,该方法涉及从干预开始就进行条件歧视培训。本研究的目的是比较3个被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的幼儿的简单条件式和仅条件式的教学方法。数据表明,仅条件教学法是一种更可靠,更有效的教学程序。另外,在使用简单条件方法的训练过程中出现了几种错误模式。讨论了结果与早期干预计划中当前教学实践的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号